Skip to content

Futures on responses #1

Open
Open

Description

@rgbkrk

We've done a bit of musing on how we would use concurrent.futures within a Python 3 version of multyvac/cloud.

This would mean that our underlying network client would need to use either:

Activity

  1. rgbkrk commented on Mar 24, 2015

    @rgbkrk
    MemberAuthor

    Apparently requests futures uses a ThreadPoolExecutor underneath, which seems like an odd bit to expose controls for. IMO, tornado gets a lot more active development relying on libcurl. We don't get the nicety of the requests interface though.

    The sad part about picking async is that our barrier to entry for contributors is a bit higher.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions